INCOMPAS to FCC: Burning the ‘Bridge 2 Broadband’ Means LESS Competition, Reduced Deployment and Higher Prices

Exterior shot of the Capitol building dome

WASHINGTON DC (February 5, 2020) – In a detailed and forceful filing today, INCOMPAS, the internet and competitive networks association, came out swinging against the FCC’s proposal to end bipartisan competition laws which would raise prices and cut off the bridge to broadband utilized by millions of Americans.

“Consumers are demanding more broadband competition, and the FCC proposal gives them less,” said Chip Pickering, CEO of INCOMPAS. “Cutting off competition and granting this massive price hike for big telecom providers hurts consumers, businesses, and small local fiber builders who are deploying fiber networks critical to delivering faster speeds, as well as our nation’s 5G future.”

*To read a copy of the INCOMPAS filing, click here.

In December, the FCC voted to move forward on a controversial Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) written to eliminate competition laws that help connect urban and rural communities to new, competitive networks. The move stunned competition advocates for two reasons.

First, there is universal agreement that the FCC’s broadband maps are badly broken. However the Commission plans to rely on data they know to be flawed in order to justify cutting off competition in urban and rural markets. INCOMPAS calls the broadband maps inaccuracy ‘indisputable.’ “The big telecom companies agree that millions of locations in rural America are being mischaracterized as served. But while they are demanding new maps for more government subsidies, they want the FCC to rely on flawed maps for competition-killing price hikes. They can’t have it both ways,” Pickering said.

Second, the FCC’s effort to reduce competition and choice in broadband service in this proceeding clearly runs counter to the Commission’s actions in other proceedings to enable high-speed broadband, future-proof networks, and 5G deployment. In fact, the FCC just completed an 18-month forbearance proceeding, and after review of the very same record, USTelecom withdrew its request to cut off competition. That record includes letters from over 11,000 customers in 36 states who depend on competitive broadband providers’ networks for faster speeds, lower prices, and better customer service.

The INCOMPAS filing states: “Evidence from the forbearance proceeding shows that the Bridge 2 Broadband/UNEs have spurred, rather than delayed, the deployment of fiber and broadband services, including in areas where the large incumbents have not upgraded their own facilities.”

In addition to deployment and 5G, INCOMPAS also warned of the impact cutting off competition and raising prices will have on small businesses and government agencies – including public safety officials – who depend on competitive networks that utilize the bridge to broadband for taxpayer savings and connecting our troops in the field.

*To learn more about the Bridge 2 Broadband please WATCH.

**Full link to INCOMPAS Filing: https://www.incompas.org//Files/filings/2020/02-05-2020%20Comments%20of%20INCOMPAS%20and%20NWTA%20to%20UNE%20NPRM%20(Final).pdf

##

About INCOMPAS:

INCOMPAS, the internet and competitive networks association, is the leading trade group advocating for competition policy across all networks. INCOMPAS represents Internet, streaming, communications and technology companies large and small, advocating for laws and policies that promote competition, innovation and economic development. Learn more at www.incompas.org or follow us on Twitter: @INCOMPAS @ChipPickering

As reported by Jeff Sharp, jeff@themanitou.co.

Lauren Bronston

Lauren Bronston

Lauren is a Content Writer and SEO Specialist for TelNet Worldwide. When she’s not diving into data centers or SIP Trunking, Lauren writes TV scripts and builds music playlists for fun.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

TelNet Worldwide
Scroll to Top
How can we help you?

Click to chat with a team member.

Get a Quote.
No Strings Attached.

Want to know how our features, plans and pricing could fit into your business? There's no better way to learn more than to talk to one of our Solution Specialists and get a free quote!

Blog Categories

Is Office Right for You?

Office is a calling-only package that provides HD voice on IP-enabled desk or conference phones. Office is intended for organizations who don’t use our collaboration software or perhaps use another collaboration platform and want to add voice.

Is Mobile Right for You?

Mobile is for organizations whose employees are on the move and do not need a chat platform or to host meetings. The package provides mobile calling. If softphone calling capabilities are all that is needed, our mobile package is your ideal solution.

Is Meetings Right for You?

Meetings is intended for organizations who are totally replacing an existing collaboration platform or adopting their first platform. Meetings includes calling features plus Webex, which is a full-featured collaboration suite that includes many remote and hybrid work functions.

Is Premium Meetings Right for You?

Similar to Meetings, Premium Meetings is intended for organizations replacing or adopting their first collaboration platform. Premium adds enhanced Webex features, including presenter controls and higher participant counts, making it ideal for bigger organizations who host large webinars or meetings.